[00:00:04]
[1. CALL TO ORDER]
WE'RE GOING TO GET OUR THIRD BUDGET HEARING FOR THE SPRING OF 2022 UNDERWAY.JUSTIN, WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE? MS. LEWISON. MS. MASSEY. HERE.
MS. CONEY. MR. KEITH. HERE. MS. GREEN. HERE. MR. MCCOY NOT GOING TO BE HERE TONIGHT, I DON'T BELIEVE.
SEVEN MEMBERS PRESENT, ONE ABSENT.
WE DO HAVE A QUORUM AND WE WILL CONTINUE ON WITH BUSINESS.
[3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
CAN I GET AN APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES.SO MOVED. SECOND. BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECOND.
THOSE IN FAVOR LET IT BE KNOWN BY SAYING AYE.
MOVING ON TO OUR NEW BUSINESS.
[4. NEW BUSINESS]
GETTING RIGHT DOWN TO BUSINESS.I'M JUST WAITING FOR Y'ALL TO DECIDE WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO DO? AND I'LL TAKE NOTES.
[LAUGHTER] THANK YOU. WE ARE NOW DOWN TO OUR RECLASSIFICATION OF NEW POSITIONS AND REQUEST.
I WOULD SUGGEST THAT WE LUMP ALL OF OUR OR COMBINE ALL OF OUR NEW, NOT NEW POSITIONS BUT ALL OF OUR UPGRADES TOGETHER AND HEAR THEM AT ONE TIME.
WHAT SAY YOU? ARE YOU ALL OKAY WITH THAT? I'M IN THAT WE WERE GOING TO LUMP ALL UPGRADES AND NEW POSITIONS TOGETHER THEN I THINK WHAT WE DID LAST TIME IS WE DID ALL OF THE THE UPGRADES AS ONE BATCH AND THEN HEARD THE NEW POSITIONS.
SO WAS EVERYONE GOOD WITH THAT? YES.
MASSEY AS A POINT OF CLARIFICATION WOULD THAT BE THE UPGRADES FOR DEPARTMENT 400 AS WELL AS THE UPGRADES FOR DEPARTMENT 418 YES. YES.
SO WE WILL BEGIN OR SHOULD I SAY.
OKAY. AND THEN WE SEND THAT TO THE FULL QUORUM COURT WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION.
SECOND. IT HAS BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECOND, THAT THIS GO TO THE FULL QUORUM COURT.
IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION? IF THERE BE NONE.
JUSTIN, WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE? YES, MA'AM. SO YOUR ONE VOTE WILL BE RECORDED FOR THE FOLLOWING UPGRADES.
PERSONNEL SPECIALIST 16 DISPATCHERS, ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SUPERVISOR, FOUR ENFORCEMENT CLERKS, SECRETARY THREE, AND PERSONNEL SPECIALIST, ASSISTANT MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT, TWO PLUMBERS, TWO LOCKING DEVICES, NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR, DETENTION CLERK, FOUR DETENTION CLERKS, DETENTION CLERK TWO, AND THAT'S IT.
YES. SEVEN AYE'S ONE NON-VOTING ABSENT.
THANK YOU. THESE WILL GO TO THE FULL QUORUM COURT FOR FINAL APPROVAL.
WE ARE NOW DOWN TO HEARING OUR NEW POSITIONS AND I AM ASSUMING THAT WE WILL, I GUESS, HEAR THEM ONE AT A TIME IF NEED BE. SO IF WE HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK AND WE WILL START WITH THE FIRST NEW POSITION THAT I SEE ON THE LIST, WHICH IS VICTIM ASSISTANCE COORDINATOR.
YES. MS. MASSEY. YES. YOU'RE ALL FOUR.
YES. THAT WE HEAR ALL FOUR AT THE SAME TIME.
[00:05:05]
OBJECTIVITY WHAT THE PROPER STAFFING LEVEL IS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION.IT'S BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECOND THAT WE APPROVE ALL OF THE NEW POSITIONS EXCEPT FOR THE 26 DEPUTIES, THE LIEUTENANT NEW POSITION, AND THAT WE ALSO DO A HAVE AN ANALYSIS DONE OF WHAT OUR NEEDS ARE IN THE COUNTY IN REGARDS TO SAFETY.
MS. MASSEY THAT'S BEEN PROPERLY MOTIONED AND SECOND.
CAN I EXPOUND ON MY MOTION? YES, YOU MAY. THANK YOU.
AFTER MUCH CONSIDERATION, I BELIEVE THAT THIS APPROACH IS THE MOST PRUDENT AND JUDICIOUS WAY IN WHICH TO PROCEED CONCERTING THIS ISSUE. A LOT HAS CHANGED SINCE 2006, WHEN WE LAID OFF 26 PATROL DEPUTIES AT THAT POINT IN TIME DUE TO A 7 MILLION BUDGET SHORTFALL.
AT THAT POINT, OF THE 15 OF US, MS. MASSEY AND I WERE THE ONLY TWO THAT ARE STILL HERE.
BUT WE VERY MUCH REMEMBER THAT SITUATION.
IN THE LAST 20 YEARS, LITTLE ROCK, NORTH LITTLE ROCK, SHERWOOD, JACKSONVILLE AND MAUMELLE HAVE ANNEXED A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF SQUARE MILEAGE THAT USED TO BE UNINCORPORATED AND PATROLLED BY THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE.
AS WELL IN THE PAST 20 YEARS, THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE LIVING IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF PULASKI COUNTY HAS BEEN REDUCED BY APPROXIMATELY 50% DUE TO BOTH ANNEXATION, AS WELL AS PEOPLE MOVING AWAY FROM UNINCORPORATED PULASKI COUNTY.
I BELIEVE THAT COMMISSIONING OF THIS STUDY SHOULD BE A PRIORITY AND THAT WE SHOULD MOVE ON IT QUICKLY WITH THE GOAL OF HAVING THE ANALYSIS BACK IN TIME FOR OUR FALL BUDGET HEARINGS, IF ALL POSSIBLE.
I ALSO WANT TO EXPRESS THAT I BELIEVE THAT IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE SHERIFF HAVE A SEAT AT THE TABLE IN THE SELECTION OF THE CONSULTING FIRM. IT IS ALSO VITALLY IMPORTANT THAT ALL PARTIES AGREE TO LIVE BY THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY AND TO WORK TOGETHER TO ADDRESS THE NEEDS THAT THE STUDY CONVEYS IN A PUNCTUAL AND A PROMPT MANNER.
IN CLOSING ON MY MOTION, WHEN WE SPEND MONEY, PARTICULARLY LARGE SUMS OF MONEY IN THIS NATURE, I BELIEVE IT'S INCUMBENT ON US AS A BODY TO HAVE ALL OF THE ANALYTIC AND DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION IN FRONT OF US IN ORDER TO MAKE THE MOST LOGICAL AND DATA DRIVEN DECISIONS ON BEHALF OF THE TAXPAYERS THAT WE SERVE.
I BELIEVE THAT THIS APPROACH IS THE MOST PRUDENT AND JUDICIOUS WAY IN WHICH TO PROCEED WITH DETERMINING THE NEEDS OF OUR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? JUSTICE KEITH, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.
AND I'M NOT SURE WHO THIS QUESTION WOULD GO TO, BUT IN THIS STUDY, IS IT GOING TO LOOK AT THE MONEY NECESSARY TO RUN A FACILITY LIKE THIS OR CAN IT? THIS IS ONLY ON THE ENFORCEMENT SIDE.
SO IF WE DO A STUDY ON THE ENFORCEMENT SIDE AND IT ACTUALLY TELLS US THAT WE NEED THE 26 DEPUTIES AND THE LIEUTENANT AND THINGS LIKE THAT THEN HOW DO WE, WHAT DO WE LOOK AT TO DETERMINE WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM? WHAT TYPE OF STUDY WOULD WE? BECAUSE MY CONCERN IS EVERYBODY KNOWS MY CONCERN IS THE BOTTOM LINE.
SO WE GET A STUDY THAT SAYS THIS IS WHAT THE JAIL ACTUALLY NEEDS.
THEN WHAT WOULD BE OUR WHAT WOULD MOVE US FORWARD IN MAKING SURE THE MONEY IS AVAILABLE FOR THAT? YOU'RE GOING TO CALL ME, I'M SURE, AND GO, HEY, HOW MUCH MONEY [LAUGHTER] YEAH. AND IT COULD BE SOMETHING ALONG THE LINES THAT THEY CAME BACK AND SAID, HEY, YOU GUYS ARE ACTUALLY PROBABLY 30 DEPUTIES SHORT.
AND YOU GUYS MIGHT SAY, OKAY, WELL, WE SAID WE'D LIVE AND DIE BY THIS, SO MAYBE WE DO SEVEN THIS TIME AND TEN THE NEXT TIME AND GET TO THAT POINT, JUST LIKE HOW YOU CHASE THE SALARY ADJUSTMENT SCALES, YOU'RE AIMING FOR THAT GOAL.
SO IT'S BEEN A WHILE SINCE A FULL COMPREHENSIVE STUDY HAS BEEN DONE.
I THINK IT'S BEEN PROBABLY 31 YEARS, IT'S THE LAST ONE I'VE SEEN.
SO I THINK IT CAN BE BENEFICIAL.
AND I THINK THAT IF IT SAYS THAT YOU NEED CERTAIN THINGS IN ENFORCEMENT BASED ON THAT STUDY, THEN I THINK YOU GUYS SHOULD ADHERE TO IT. OKAY.
[00:10:04]
SO MY NEXT QUESTION IS I'VE GOT A QUESTION ABOUT A POSITION WHO DO I ASK THAT? I'VE GOT A QUESTION ABOUT THE VICTIM ASSISTANCE COORDINATOR.ANYBODY FROM THE JAIL CAN ANSWER THAT FOR ME? AND THE PLAN WOULD BE TO HAVE THAT POSITION ASSIGNED TO MY AREA.
HOW DID WE DETERMINE THAT WE NEEDED THIS AT THE JAIL? JUST CURIOUS. IT'S NOT FOR THE JAIL IT'S FOR THE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION.
FOR THE ENFORCEMENT SIDE, YEAH.
DURING THAT TIME, THERE'S NO REAL SERVICES THAT ARE ABLE TO BE PROVIDED.
IF IT'S A MISDEMEANOR CHARGE, THEN IT WOULDN'T BE GOING TO CIRCUIT COURT.
THEN THEY'RE KIND OF OUT THERE ON THEIR OWN.
AND THAT'S WHENEVER WE DO ONE OF THE MANY, MANY THINGS THAT WE DO THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY IN LAW ENFORCEMENT IS TO GUIDE THEM AND DIRECT THEM IN THE PROCESSES FOR ORDERS OR PROTECTIONS AND STUFF LIKE THAT.
THIS PERSON WOULD BE HELPING THEM IN THE PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION STAGE OF A CRIME.
THAT'S WHEN WE'RE LOOKING INTO IT.
THERE'S SOME CASES THAT ARE NEVER REFERRED FOR PROSECUTION THAT WE CAN'T PROVE.
SO THEN THEY NEVER MAKE IT TO CIRCUIT COURT, BUT WE CAN STILL PROVIDE SOME SERVICES FOR THEM.
WE WOULD HAVE THEM RESPONDING IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS IN AFTER HOURS FOR MAJOR CRIMES LIKE HOMICIDES.
WE DO THE BEST WE CAN WITH INFORMING THEM OF WHAT THEY NEED TO DO AND WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN.
THEY'D BE DEALING WITH COMMUNITY SERVICE PROVIDERS TO HELP WITH EMERGENCY SHELTER, FOLLOW UP WITH THE VICTIMS. THERE ARE CERTAIN THINGS THAT ARE SET UP BY STATUTE THAT YOU HAVE TO DO FROM AN ACTIVE BACK IN 1997.
SO IT GOES INTO A LOT OF DETAIL ON THAT.
WE'VE BEEN ON OUR OWN HAVING OUR PATROL PERSONNEL FOLLOW UP ON VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
AND SOMETIMES THERE'S NO CHARGES.
THEY CAN'T ARREST ANYBODY. BUT WE TRY TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY KNOW THAT WE'RE STILL HERE FOR THEM.
VICTIM ASSISTANCE POSITION COULD ALSO DO THAT.
WE HAVE A LIST OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE REPORTS THAT COME IN DAILY.
THEY CAN FOLLOW UP AND CONTACT THEM.
SOMETIMES IT'S BETTER TO HAVE SOMEONE WITH A SOFTER APPROACH THAT WORKS IN THAT AREA.
SO WILL THIS BE A DEPUTY OR WILL IT BE A CIVILIAN? WHAT TYPE OF INDIVIDUALS? CIVILIAN POSITION IT WOULD NOT BE LAW ENFORCEMENT? THEY WOULDN'T BE LAW ENFORCEMENT, BUT THEY WILL BE ASSISTING IN THE INVESTIGATION.
THEY WOULD BE ASSISTING WITH THE VICTIMS. OKAY. AND KIND OF LIKE HELPING INTERACT BETWEEN THEM AND US AND THE COURTS.
THEY CAN EVEN THE COURTHOUSE THAT THEY WOULD ANY CRIMES THAT WE CHARGE GO RIGHT UP THE TOP OF THE HILL AT PCDC AND THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO GO TO COURT WITH THEM IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES AND BE THERE IN THE MORNING IN CASES, MAKING SURE THAT THEY'RE AWARE THAT THEY CAN GO TO THESE HEARINGS WHERE THE SUSPECTS ARE GOING TO APPEAR IF THEY CHOOSE TO, MAKING SURE THAT THEY KNOW HOW TO REGISTER FOR THE VINE PROGRAM, WHICH AUTOMATICALLY LETS THEM KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THE SUSPECT OR THE PERSON CHARGED IF IT GOES INTO A CONVICTION.
AND THIS IS THE LAST QUESTION AND MAYBE YOU CAN ANSWER THIS.
I WAS JUST LOOKING AT THIS POSITION.
AND THEN I LOOK OVER AND I SEE THAT MAYBE A DEPUTY IS AND THEY ARE SUBJECT.
[00:15:04]
WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE IN POSITIONS THAT ONE WOULD BE SUBJECTED TO RANDOM DRUG TESTING AND THE OTHER ONE WOULD NOT? I'M JUST. RIGHT OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD, I'D SAY THAT THEY DON'T HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH ANY NARCOTICS OR MONEY.AND SOMEBODY ELSE MIGHT BE ABLE TO ANSWER IT.
OKAY. I WOULD TELL YOU THAT I DISAGREE WITH THAT RECOMMENDATION.
I THINK THEY SHOULD BE SAFETY SENSITIVE.
RIGHT NOW HR DISAGREES WITH US.
THAT'S WHY THAT'S POSTED THAT WAY.
BUT THEY WILL BE PART OF OUR RANDOM DRUG TEST.
I WAS JUST CURIOUS. I SAW THAT AND.
[LAUGHTER] I DON'T KNOW ARE YOU FINISHED? YEAH, I YIELD. I'M SORRY.
I YIELD. THANK YOU JUSTICE KEITH.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THE MOTION THAT IS ON THE FLOOR? YOU'RE RECOGNIZED, JUSTIN.
ARE YOU CALLING THE ROLL OR NOT YET? I WAS ASKING WHETHER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.
AND I THINK WE DO HAVE A QUESTION FROM ONE OF.
YEAH I WAS GOING TO RESTATE IT.
SO I BELIEVE THE MOTION ON THE TABLE IS TO ADOPT THE REQUEST FOR THE VICTIM ASSISTANCE COORDINATOR, THE BUDGET GRANT ADMINISTRATOR, A NEW DETENTION ANALYST AND A CHAPLAIN POSITION, AND THAT THE 26 DEPUTIES AND LIEUTENANTS WOULD BE PULLED FROM CONSIDERATION UNTIL A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
IT'S A RATHER LONG MOTION, BUT THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE VOTING ON.
JUSTICE BLACKWOOD YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.
IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT. AND I WAS JUST WONDERING HOW MUCH A STUDY LIKE THIS MIGHT COST THE COUNTY.
I DON'T KNOW THE COMPTROLLER'S HERE.
I DO KNOW THAT NO MATTER WHAT IT COSTS, IT IS NEEDED.
I HAVE NO WAY OF KNOWING IT UNTIL WE REACH OUT FOR PROPOSALS.
FIRST I'VE HEARD OF IT, SO I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT IT COSTS.
WHEN YOU SAY IT WAS DONE IN 90? THEY DID ONE IN 90. BUT WE ALSO DID A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY ON DETENTION AND THE JUSTICE JUVENILE OR THE COURT SYSTEMS IN 2017.
AND IT WAS FAIRLY NOMINAL, UNDER 100,000, I BELIEVE.
I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT WOULD COST IN TODAY'S DOLLARS.
I MEAN, BUT THAT'S WHAT WE DID.
SO UNTIL THE RFPS AND RFQS GO OUT.
YEAH, BECAUSE WE'RE ALWAYS WORRIED ABOUT THE BOTTOM LINE.
SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU KNOW HOW MUCH THIS MIGHT COST US.
THANK YOU. MS. MASSEY. THANK YOU JUSTICE BLACKWOOD.
JUSTICE STOWERS YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.
YEAH. I JUST WANT TO REITERATE WHAT I SAID EARLIER.
I YIELD. THANK YOU, JUSTICE STOWERS.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? IF THERE BE NONE.
JUSTIN, WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE? MS. LEWISON.
MS. GREEN. AYE. MR. MCCOY'S ABSENT. MR. STOWERS.
YES. SEVEN AYE'S. THIS WILL GO TO THE FULL QUORUM COURT FOR FINAL APPROVAL.
YOU HAVE A SERIES OF PROPOSALS THAT HAVE BEEN PUT BEFORE YOU.
JUSTICE STOWERS YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.
SO WHAT WE HAD BEFORE IS PROPOSALS FOR COUNTY LONGEVITY, MERIT BONUSES, COUNTY EDUCATIONAL BONUSES AND RECRUITMENT BONUSES THAT ARE SPECIFIC TO THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE ENFORCEMENT AND DETENTION AND JUVENILE DETENTION.
WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO IS MAKE A MOTION THAT WE SEND THE RECRUITMENT BONUSES FOR THE SHERIFF'S ENFORCEMENT DETENTION AND JUVENILE DETENTION ONLY TO THE FULL QUORUM COURT WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION, AND THAT WE DEFER THE LONGEVITY MERIT BONUSES FOR COUNTY WIDE AS WELL AS EDUCATIONAL BONUSES COUNTY WIDE UNTIL SUCH TIME AS WE HAVE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THOSE, HOPEFULLY BY OUR FALL BUDGET HEARINGS.
THAT'S MY MOTION. WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR.
[00:20:01]
IT REQUIRES A SECOND.SECOND. IT'S BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECOND THAT WE WILL CONSIDER ONE OF THESE PROPOSALS THAT THAT BEING THE RECRUITMENT BONUSES FOR THE SHERIFF'S DETENTION AND JUVENILE DETENTION ONLY. SO WHAT THE PROPOSAL IN FRONT OF YOU THAT YOU WOULD BE VOTING ON IS WOULD PROVIDE A $5,000 BONUS FOR SWORN EMPLOYEES IN THE SHERIFF'S ENFORCEMENT DETENTION AND JUVENILE DETENTION UP TO BUT NOT TO EXCEED 5,000 DOLLARS.
THAT'S GOING TO COME OUT OF THE RESERVE FUND THAT YOU RECENTLY WHEN YOU DID THE CARRYOVER YOU PUT ABOUT 7.6 AND CHANGE INTO THE EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND.
THAT'S AND 400,000 IN DETENTION AND 30,000 IN JUVENILE DETENTION.
THAT'S A TOTAL OF 555,000 IN BONUSES.
ABOUT 143 IN FRINGES GIVES YOU A GRAND TOTAL OF $600,098.
[LAUGHTER] SO THIS IS PRETTY IN LINE WITH SOME OF THE NUMBERS THAT WERE ON THE SHERIFF'S PROPOSAL.
I THINK THAT THEY MAY ACTUALLY BE COMING OUT A LITTLE BIT AHEAD ON THE ENFORCEMENT SIDE AND PRETTY CLOSE ON THE DETENTION SIDE AS FAR AS THE TRAINING OR THE RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION BONUSES.
JUSTICE KEITH, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.
I NEED TO ASK THE QUESTION. AND AGAIN, I'M NOT SURE WHO I WOULD ASK THAT TO.
BUT MY QUESTION IS, HOW DOES IT BENEFIT OR HOW IS THAT BENEFITING THE COUNTY, MAYBE EVEN THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, IF WE'RE PULLING THE FIRST TWO, CAN I GUESS MAYBE I'M ASKING FOR A BETTER EXPLANATION WHEN YOU SAY COUNTY WIDE.
SINCE I MADE THE MOTION, CAN I RESPOND TO THAT? SO.
YOU'RE RECOGNIZED. THANK YOU, MA'AM.
THE FIRST TWO, THE LONGEVITY OF MERIT BONUSES, AS WELL AS THE EDUCATIONAL BONUSES THE OTHER DEPARTMENTS AND ELECTED OFFICIALS ACROSS THE COUNTY HAVE ASKED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS AND THE STUDY OF THAT.
AND, YOU KNOW, WE JUST DON'T HAVE THE TIME TO DO THAT.
AND SO THAT IS THE, I GUESS YOU WOULD SAY, THE METHOD BEHIND THE MADNESS OF MY MOTION.
THEY CALL YOU PERSONALLY. OKAY.
I YIELD. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THE MOTION THAT'S ON THE FLOOR? SO THE MOTION IS TO ADOPT THE COUNTY SIGNING BONUS AND RETENTION FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT DETENTION AND JUVENILE DETENTION.
THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE VOTING ON AND TO DEFER THE OTHER REQUESTS.
OKAY. ONE YOU'RE RECOGNIZED. OKAY.
SO WHAT'S THE EFFECTIVE DATE IF WE APPROVE THE RECRUITMENT BONUSES? WHAT'S THE EFFECTIVE DATE THAT THEY WOULD START? IT'S MAY 21ST, 2022.
I GUESS. I THINK THAT'S A PAYROLL NUMBER.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THAT WOULD BE THE FIRST PAYROLL FOR JUNE.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IF THEY'RE BEING NONE JUSTIN CALL THE ROLL PLEASE.
MS. CONEY. I'M GOING TO ABSTAIN ON THIS ONE.
ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE, SIX AYE'S.
THE ITEM GOES TO THE FULL QUORUM COURT.
SO THIS WILL GO TO THE FULL QUORUM COURT FOR FINAL APPROVAL.
CAN I GET A MOTION TO ADJOURN? [INAUDIBLE].
SECOND. MS. MASSEY. BEFORE WE MAKE AN ANNOUNCEMENT. SO POINT OF ORDER.
[00:25:08]
NO, WE'RE NO, IT'S NOT NEEDED.THEY'VE BEEN DONE INDIVIDUALLY.
WE'LL PACKAGE THEM INTO ONE ORDINANCE FOR YOU GUYS.
I WOULD LIKE TO THANK ALL OF OUR GUESTS HERE TONIGHT, ALL OF OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT, THE SHERIFF FOR COMING AND ALL OF HIS COLLEAGUES. ARE THERE ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS? ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? NO, MA'AM. THANK YOU ALL.
AND WE WILL SEE YOU IN THE FALL.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.